Japan is the only country in the G7 that does not legally recognize same-sex unions nationally in any form. [6][7] In March and May , the Sapporo and Nagoya District Courts ruled that not recognising same-sex marriage was a violation of the Constitution respectively. [8][9] While in June , the Osaka District Court ruled that not.
In June , while the Fukuoka District Court recognized the failings of Japan’s legal system and suggested that the legislative system should respect the rights of same-sex couples. The Court still upheld the government ban on same-sex marriage. The Tokyo District Court reached a similar verdict in November A Japanese high court has ruled that Japan’s refusal to legally recognize same-sex marriages is unconstitutional, a latest victory for the same sex couples and supporters seeking equal rights.
Thanks to widespread public support and new legal rulings that pressure the government, same-sex marriage in Japan could be legal soon. Click to learn more. As of July 2, , gay marriage is not allowed by law in Japan. Even though support in the public is growing and there are cases challenging the ban, Japan is the only country in the G7 that has not made same-sex marriage or partnerships legal nationwide.
The rulings in separate cases found that the ban breached citizens' rights. To pursue marriage equality, activists have started using different methods, including judicial action, to achieve their goal of legalising same-sex marriage. Japan's constitution currently defines marriage as one between "both sexes".
Recently Published. The ruling seemed to affect public opinion regarding same-sex marriage only in the immediate aftermath of the ruling, and had no lasting effect. We can therefore assume that in Fukuoka and surrounding prefectures, most or at least a large proportion of Japanese adults have heard about the ruling. The 13 December ruling in Fukuoka High Court The recent ruling in Fukuoka is the eighth ruling among these cases so far.
The most recent High Court ruling in Fukuoka found the same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional under three constitutional provisions. It may also be the case that people do not yet see or understand the purpose of the lawsuits. With the exception of the ruling by the Osaka local court in , other courts have ruled that the current system is unconstitutional. Recently, a Pew Research report showed that public opinion in Japan has become much more tolerant of sexual minorities.
The cases have been closely watched in a country still largely bound by traditional gender roles and family values. July 14, Japan same-sex marriage ban ruled unconstitutional again by courts. The Tokyo District Court reached a similar verdict in November The bill has been widely criticized by rights groups due to its failure to address the protection of LGBTI rights from discrimination in a definitive manner.
But, argues Cecilia Gustavsson, without improved transparency and independent verification mechanisms, the NPT could, paradoxically, accelerate a new nuclear arms race. This effect had already dissipated within 24 hours of the verdict. We must thus conclude that the ruling had no lasting effect on public opinion. His government is yet to disclose any plans to change or review marriage legislation. Nonetheless, Japan's government, led by the conservative Liberal Democratic Party LDP , is reportedly staunchly opposed to legislating on this issue.
On Thursday, a Sapporo court ruling said it was "strongly expected" that parliament would at some point "institutionalise an appropriate same-sex marriage law", noting the broad public support. Marriage equality eludes Japan's same-sex couples Why is Japan redefining rape? However, the path to marriage equality has been complicated. On Valentine's Day , six same-sex couples from all around the country filed separate lawsuits against the Japanese government.
The legal battle for LGBTI equality has been fraught with key victories and setbacks over recent years. Japan is currently the only G7 country that does not legally recognise same-sex couples. The Tokyo District Court reached a similar verdict in November However, these certificates do not completely mirror the legal benefits of marriage, such as automatic inheritance.
Copyright ©oarrake.pages.dev 2025